Home » Posts tagged "Monster Movie Month" (Page 5)

Monster Movie Month: Werewolves, Wolf Men and Lycans, Oh My! Guest Post by Gregory Lamberson

Gregory Lamberson is both a filmmaker and author working in the horror genre. As a filmmaker he’s best known for the cult favorite Slime City and its sequel Slime City Massacre. In addition, he’s the author of the nonfiction filmmaking book Cheap Scares!: Low Budget Horror Filmmakers Share Their Secrets (I’m reading this right now, and his writing really shines). Gregory is also the author of many horror fiction titles reviewed at MonsterLibrarian.com, including Johnny Gruesome (reviewed here); the occult series The Jake Helman Files (which includes Personal Demons (reviewed here), Desperate Souls (reviewed here), and Cosmic Forces (reviewed here); and, most recently, the werewolf series The Frenzy Cycle. The first book in the series is The Frenzy Way (reviewed here); the second book, The Frenzy War (reviewed here),was just released this June.

Because of his experience in both filmmaking and fiction in the horror genre, and his contributions to werewolf fiction, we asked Gregory if he’d share a little about werewolf movies and how they’ve influenced him. You can see what he has to say about werewolf movies in his guest post below. Once you’re done, scroll down to check out our suggested links!

 

 

Werewolves, Wolf Men and Lycans – Oh, My!

By Gregory Lamberson

 

If Rodney Dangerfeld was alive today, and he was infected with lycanthropy, his catch phrase would still be “I don’t get no respect.”  Werewolves are the shaggy dogs of horror, be it literature or cinema.  Some people complain about vampires, others wish zombies would go away, and both camps seem to despise werewolves.  Not me, I love them, which should come as no surprise since I’ve completed two books in my Frenzy Wolves Cycle, The Frenzy Way and The Frenzy War.  But this blog isn’t about my work, it’s about my influences: the moon howlers that have inspired me.  There are readers and moviegoers out there who, like me, know that when treated properly, werewolves kick butt…and chew it…and spit it out.  It’s their ferocity that makes them more visceral than those talky vampires and slow, shuffling zombies.

 

I probably didn’t know what a were-creature was until my mother bought me the Aurora Wolf Man monster model kit.  To me, he didn’t look like much: sort of a dirty, hillbilly old man.  Because of the syndication packages broadcast on my local TV stations in those days before cable, VHS and DVD, I grew up on Hammer films rather than the Universal classics, but I studied film history through books and became well aware of Larry Talbot; and before The Wolf Man, The Werewolf of London.  As a voracious reader, I soon discovered that wolf men/werewolves took their inspiration not from a literary classic as so many of the other movie monsters did, but that much of the lore I took as written in stone had actually been created by screenwriter Curt Siodmak for The Wolf Man; that man was a creative genius.

 

The wolf men I grew up with were TV movie creations, usually stunt men filmed in low light to prevent their rubber masks from showing.  In Moon of the Wolf, David Jansen battled a “loup garou” in Louisiana; Robert Foxworth wore a Hawaiian shirt for his transformations in Death Moon; and Peter Graves proved that Clint Walker was just playing “The Most Dangerous Game” in Scream of the Wolf.  Even Carl Kolchak got into the “Is that a werewolf?  It’s too dark to tell!” game in an episode of Kolchak: The Night Stalker.  During this same period, Famous Monsters of Filmland and The Monster Times made me aware of the films The Werewolf of Washington and The Boy Who Cried Werewolf; I believe this was the beginning of pop culture’s swing toward preferring “werewolf” as the correct beastly term, and Marvel’s Werewolf by Night comic sealed the deal: The Wolf Man was old hat.

 

For lycanthropy fans, the seventies ended on a high note with the publication of three  influential werewolf novels: The Howling, by Gary Brandner; The Wolfen, by Whitley Strieber; and what remains the greatest werewolf novel, The Nightwalker, by Thomas Tessier.  At the time, Brandner’s novel seemed like a less ambitious, less literary attempt to replicate King’s Salem’s Lot, substituting werewolves for vampires; it seemed ideally suited to be another TV movie of the week.  In retrospect, it’s an admirable novel, tight and to the point.  The Wolfen, about two unbelievable cops battling a small pack of super intelligent wolves, never really impressed me, but it was a bestseller.  The Nightwalker, on the other hand, is a classic, and it’s easy to imagine John Landis reading it and thinking, “This is good, but it’s too damned serious!”  It would still make a hell of a movie…

 

I view the 1980s as the Golden Age of werewolf entertainment.  The movie adaptation of The Howling, written by John Sayles and directed by Joe Dante, made a lot of surface changes to the novel but retained much more material than people seem to remember; it also introduced the world to the first truly astounding man-into-werewolf transformation sequence, courtesy of Rob Bottin.  That scene has yet to be topped, although I think the film’s spoofy moments, which seemed fresh at the time, have dated badly.  Although written first, Landis’s An American Werewolf in London – despite a weak third act – was filmed and released after The Howling, but it is perhaps the classic werewolf film–filled to the brim with great comedy and horror, and astonishing werewolf effects by Rick Baker (apparently Bottin apprenticed under Baker, and Baker resented that his former pupil got to use his techniques on a werewolf film before he did).  Michael Wadleigh’s adaptation of Wolfen is superior to its source novel, and the film is a different breed entirely from its fellows in this period: a smart, sophisticated, and serious approach to the subject matter, with very few special effects.

 

The first werewolf boom was upon us, spawning such films as Neil Jordan’s The Company of Wolves, and the less poetic Silver Bullet, based on Stephen King’s novella Cycle of the Werewolf. The advent of VHS in the 80s unleashed an onslaught of sequels to The Howling, which enabled Sybil Danning, Reb Brown and even Christopher Lee to collect paychecks.  In 1987 I wrote a screenplay called The Greenwich Village Monster, which later evolved into The Frenzy Way.  I briefly re-titled the script Werewolf, then abandoned that moniker when Fox TV, in its infancy, launched a weekly TV series with the same name, featuring man-in-suit werewolves created by Rick Baker.  The show had a decent two hour pilot, but the weekly version’s half hour format didn’t allow the writers to develop much…anything.  Michael J. Fox delivered laughs in Teen Wolf, which begat a sequel without him, and in The Monster Squad, Fred Dekker gave us the most iconic lupine reference in cinema since Curt Siodmak wrote, “Even a man who is pure of heart…” when one of his protagonists discovered, “Wolf Man’s got nards!”  In the world of comics, Alan Moore wrote a daring issue of Swamp Thing which posed that lycanthropy was the result of a woman’s menstrual cycle and oppression.

 

The 90s were an unremarkable decade for howlers, populated by more straight to video Howling sequels and the theatrical An American Werewolf in Paris, which was a creative and box office failure.  The best excursion during this decade was the novel Animals written by John Skipp and Craig Spector (I haven’t seen the recent film adaptation, but I’ve not heard good things about it).

 

The 21st century has been kinder to the beast, producing at least three films which could become regarded as classics in time: the feminist Ginger Snaps; the masculine Dog Soldiers, and the kinetic Brotherhood of the Wolf.  Ginger Snaps, which owes a great deal thematically to the aforementioned Alan Moore Swamp Thing tale, gave birth to two sequels, both somewhat interesting but neither on par with the original.

 

When I sold my second novel, Johnny Gruesome, the word in publishing and movie circles was that werewolves were going to be “the next big thing” – how fortunate for me that I was in the process of turning The Greenwich Village Monster into The Frenzy Way! Unfortunately, the predicted boom hasn’t come to be.  Four Underworld films, several seasons of True Blood, the entire Twilight franchise, and seven Harry Potter adventures (or eight, depending on whether you count the novels or the movies) have presented werewolves to larger audiences, but in supporting roles.  Skinwalkers came and went, and squandered a good title.  Joe Johnston directed a big budget remake of The Wolfman.  I haven’t seen the film, but it did well enough for Universal to develop a straight to DVD sequel.  Tim Burton’s recent Dark Shadows revealed a werewolf almost as an afterthought, to juice up an enjoyably haphazard climax.

 

I’ve pledged to avoid werewolf fiction until I’ve completed The Frenzy Wolves Cycle, which will hopefully run another two or three books, but I’m aware they’re out there.  I did read Shara, an entry in Steven Wedel’s The Werewolf Saga, and I enjoyed Jeff Strand’s Wolf Hunt until a plot point similar to one in The Frenzy War forced me to put it down.  I read the first book in W.D. Gagliani’s series about a werewolf cop, and Christopher Fulbright’s Of Wolf and Man is on my list of titles to read far down the road.  So there are plenty of werewolf books out there to read if you’re a fan, but none of them have become bestsellers.  Of course, Anne Rice could change all of that with The Wolf Gift. . .

**********************************

If you’d like to learn a little more about some of the movies mentioned above, you can check out Werewolf-Movies.com, a database of information about werewolf movies. It’s no longer being updated, but it’s still a great resource! The site also has an article listing the “The Wolfman Returneth: Essential Werewolf Movies”. It is one person’s opinion, of course, but if you’re trying to narrow the choices down, you might want to take a look.

In the past, July has been Werewolf Month at MonsterLibrarian.com, so check out our page on werewolves and shapeshifters for all kinds of reviews and lists of great (and not so great) werewolf fiction. Just scroll down the page, and you’ll find plenty of interesting material!

 

Monster Movie Month: Friday the 13th

I’m guessing that since it’s Monster Movie Month and today happens to be Friday the 13th that you might wonder if I’m going to write about the subgenre everyone thinks about when the topic of horror movies comes up- slasher movies. Actually, I’m not that good at planning ahead, but when I realized today was Friday the 13th, I thought I should probably come up with something to say. Certainly, they were coming out in droves as I was growing up. But, honestly, this is a genre that I really don’t enjoy all that much, and outside of the first few Nightmare on Elm Street movies and a few of the more self-referential movies of the 90s and beyond, I haven’t seen the movies and don’t plan to.

It’s kind of hard to write about or even talk about horror movies without knowing the tropes, though. The plots and characters are so predictable that the denizens of the Shocklines horror community forum even compiled a horror movie survival guide... so predictable that moviemakers and can make fun of them and manipulate them (and movie watchers will enjoy it) in such films as the recently released movie The Cabin in the Woods (reviewed here, and accompanied by a great readers advisory one-sheet created by reviewer Benjamin Franz)

TVtropes.com provides a nice summary (with links) of the tropes of the slasher movie here. You can scroll down the page there to find a partial list of slasher movies. Along with Halloween and Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th is considered an iconic film in the slasher genre, and the trope codifier.

If you’d rather try out a book in honor of the movie of the day, you can visit our page of reviews on Human Horror and Psychological Terror. Note that books in this genre are not for the faint of heart- they can be graphic, brutal, and gory, but much of the time they’re also psychological in nature, which makes them a different kind of creature.

Whatever your plans, may your day be a lucky one!

Monster Movie Month: “The Blood is the Life”, Guest Post by Krista Cox

Both movies and books lend themselves to new interpretations of existing works- some that can be taken more seriously than others. Dracula, the classic novel by Bram Stoker, is an excellent example of this. In the original novel, and in early movies based on the story such as Nosferatu and Universal Studios’ Dracula (reviewed on our Monster Movie Month page in the section on Vampires, women are depicted as passive victims, but more recent versions (such as the novel Dracula in Love by Karen Essex, reviewed here, and Francis Ford Coppola’s movie Bram Stoker’s Dracula, ) suggest that they may be more independent both in their thinking and in their sexuality. It’s worthwhile, I think, to consider how the horror in the story, or at least the way it’s perceived,  has changed with the times. Krista Cox addresses this in a paper published in the journal New Views on Gender, titled “The Blood is the Life: How Bram Stoker’s Dracula Puts Life Back in Women’s Hands”, and she offered to share her take on the differences between the original novel and the Coppola movie. Agree or disagree, it’s clear that there’s a lot of room for new visions of  this classic tale in many forms. Fair warning: Krista writes pretty explicitly about sex and blood-drinking…. so you might want to make sure you don’t have a nosy kid attempting to look over your shoulder. Or skim down to the bottom for some Dracula-related links. And now, here’s what she has to say.

The Blood is the Life

Sexy vampires are “in” these days, but they’re nothing new. The sexual themes in Bram Stoker’sDraculaare impossible to miss; the novel has several scenes with vivid sexual imagery, fangs are phallic in shape, and the act of vampirism is literally penetration. Joseph Valente writes in his 2003 introduction to the novel that blood in Dracula is “a metaphor of sexual fluids,” vampirism “a metaphor of sexual appetite,” and vamping “a metaphor of sexual conquest.” If vampirism is an allegory for the surfacing of repressed sexual desires, Valente contends that the efforts of Van Helsing and the four men who love Lucy and Mina to rescue them from Dracula are “the enforcing of orthodox Victorian constraints on female sexuality.” In short, the women must be saved from becoming sexually-driven beings so that they can remain pure, as expected of them by their men. To show what’s expected of a lady in Dracula, Stoker completely desexualizes the female characters. Lucy wins the love of three of the men in the novel. But even in their private journals, the men don’t write a single sexual word about her. Even more dramatically, Mina is completely desexualized and is seen, even by her husband, as an odd combination of mother and child. The women can’t help but welcome Dracula’s vampiric advances, though. After she is bitten, Mina recalls, “I did not want to hinder him.” Lucy actively participates in the vamping, sleepwalking to the most likely location for vampiric intercourse and repeatedly removing the garlic necklace meant to repel Dracula while she slept. Ultimately, Lucy becomes undead herself, and begins not only accepting vampiric advances, but initiating them herself. Lucy is violently punished for this conversion to undaunted sexuality. The men take savage delight in driving a stake through her heart and decapitating her, and the scene is full of vivid sexual imagery. Lucy’s fiancée must thrust the stake again and again, “deeper and deeper,” as Lucy moans and writhes. When he finishes, he collapses, gasping and sweaty, reminiscent of post-orgasmic relief. Lucy returns, suddenly, to the pristine, virginal creature she was before. The men send a clear message that sexuality is reserved for them, alone by “saving” Lucy from sexuality. It’s not just sexual dominance, though, that the men wish to reestablish. Vampirism is the means by which vampires procreate. The mingling of blood creates a new vampire, blood in the novel is a symbol for sexual fluids, and the mingling of sexual fluids creates a new human. Vampirism and intercourse are both acts of passion and procreation. This allegory becomes even more interesting when you consider that blood plays an indispensable role in human procreation. Just as blood is sustenance to the vampires, blood is a life-giving fluid for humans, providing oxygen and nutrients to a fetus in utero. Without the blood of a mother, human procreation is impossible. This gives women a very particular, special role in human procreation. In human women, the blood is the life. By controlling female sexuality, the men of Dracula seek not only to control women, but to control the creation of new life. The film Bram Stoker’s Dracula, directed by Francis Ford Coppola, clearly embraces Valente’s theory of vampirism as a symbol of sexuality. In fact, it lifts it out of metaphor and makes vampirism an actual act of sex. In the film, every act of vamping is accompanied by an explicit sexual act. Coppola departs from Stoker’s message of male dominance over female sexuality and the creation of life, though. Rather than being desexualized, the women in the film are overtly and independently sexual. They speak freely about the pleasures of sex and openly pursue their suitors. Mina even willingly participates in infidelity with Dracula. By contrast, the men are presented as bumbling, inept fools, rather than the dashing saviors of the novel. When Lucy becomes a vampire in the film, her offing is dramatically different from the novel. In the novel, the undead Lucy is “more radiantly beautiful than ever,” but the undead Lucy of the film is unattractive and asexual. The destruction of the undead Lucy carries none the sexual undertones of the scene in the novel; she lies perfectly still as the stake is driven into her heart, and her killer does not collapse in post-coital exhaustion after the deed is complete. There is no sense that Lucy is being punished for her sexuality; rather, it would appear she is being punished for her departure from it. The power and control of women in Bram Stoker’s Dracula is further reinforced by Mina’s relationship with Dracula. When they first meet, she coldly rejects him. Later, as he confesses that he is soulless, he cowers away from her, weak and filled with shame. In the novel, Dracula forces himself upon Mina, but in the film, Mina consciously chooses to drinks his blood despite his protests. Like Lucy, Mina is in control of her sexuality and in control of the men in her life. While the finale of the novel sees the men gallantly “saving” Mina from the fate of a life of “voluptuous wantonness” as a vampire, the finale of the film is the ultimate display of feminine mastery of life. When Mina selflessly sacrifices her love, Dracula, she is released from the life of the undead. Further, she releases Dracula from his prison of immortality to join his first love in eternal life. From what was undead, she created life. Dracula made heroes of those who pursued Dracula to preserve the paternalistic construct that gave them power over female sexuality and the creation of life. Bram Stoker’s Dracula rejected that construct, making women the ultimate controllers of both female and male sexuality. It made a hero of the woman who embraced her power and sexuality and allowed no man to claim them – even Dracula. In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Mina created life where the men in Dracula only destroyed it.

*******************************

Are you intrigued enough to try out additional interpretations of Dracula? Here’s a good Dracula filmography from PBS’ Masterpiece Theatre. Want to try a book instead? Check out our reviews of adult vampire fiction here, and our reviews of young adult vampire fiction here (including Kate Cary’s excellent novel Bloodline, loosely based on Dracula). We have some graphic novel adaptations of Dracula on ouryoung adult graphic novels page, and if that doesn’t satisfy your appetite, you can visit our YA vampire fiction blog Reading Bites. Be warned, though, when making recommendations, that Dracula doesn’t sparkle. Stoker’s novel, and its children, have sharp teeth.