Home » 2011 » March

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Dreadfully Ever After- Check it out!

Tonight, as part of the blog tour for Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Dreadfully Ever After, we’ll be posting our review of the book. The short version- in the words of our reviewer, Sheila Shedd- “I LOVED THIS BOOK”! Read her review to find out why.

Keep your eyes open for the premiere of the book trailer for Dreadfully Ever After on March 24th. I’m told that the makers went all out and that it looks amazing.

There’s also a giveaway. Etsy artist SpecialMeat has been commissioned to create special Dreadful Antidote pendants. If you give the Dreadfully Ever After page a “like” on Facebook, you’ll have a chance to win one.

Guest post: Libraries, Research, and Horror Fiction by Chelsea Quinn Yarbro

MonsterLibrarian.com is pleased to be a part of the blog tour for Chelsea Quinn Yarbro’s new book, An Embarrassment of Riches. We asked Chelsea to tell us about her experiences with libraries and how she does the research for her books. What she shared with us here is really inspiring, and I’m excited about having the chance to read her book and tell you all about it later this month.  Thanks, Chelsea!

Libraries, Research, and Horror Fiction
by Chelsea Quinn Yarbro

It has been said that to become a writer is to condemn yourself to a lifetime of homework, which is true as far as it goes, but not such an onerous burden to those of us who like homework.  Since I was a kid, I’ve collected books — I still do, and I have a pretty good research library in my basement which I use fairly often.  Most of my dictionaries are at my left shoulder in my office, and some basic texts on a wide variety of subjects — the history of weapon, ships, trade, fabric, clothes, shoes, food, travel, vehicles, architecture, horses, science, engineering, and art, to mention those I can see by turning my head — all very useful for a writer.

For the more specific questions, I have another pair of approach — the Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and grad students.  The Cal libraries are a splendid source of all kinds of information.  As a trained cartographer, I’m particularly fond of the map room, and although there are a number of books of maps in my own library, Cal has a truly wonderful collection that I love to explore.  When I have a sense of a locale, I have a much better feel for the story that takes place in it, so what I gain from the map room I find invaluable.  The one thing I would advise anyone using the Bancroft Library, or any university library, to make a list of the subjects you intend to research, otherwise you’re apt to be overwhelmed by the volume of information available to you.

Now, about grad students: when I have a subject I need to research that is either controversial or about which there is relatively reliable information available, or for that matter, if I want to be able to ask questions, I contact a grad student in the field in which I’m researching, and take him or her to lunch, and encourage her or him to expound on the topic while I take notes and ask questions.  Once in a while, I’ll take two grad students to lunch and listen to them disagree, which I find a very useful tool in sorting out various thorny problems encountered in doing historical research as part of the preparation for writing novels.

When I was working on An Embarrassment of Riches, I had some doubts about a few of the historical sources I had used, and took a grad student to lunch, and asked him what he could tell me about the impact that Bohemia’s war with Hungary had on Queen Kunigunde’s Court — the Queen was the grand-daughter of King Bela of Hungary and the wife of King Otakar II of Bohemia.  It struck me that there might be various kinds of spying going on in such a Court, and if so, who was spying on whom?  I also had read up on trade in Bohemia, since at the time it was the richest kingdom in Europe; I could find relatively little information on what that did to trade.  In this case, it was two grad students, and they had a lively debate which ended up telling me a lot about the Guilds of Prague.  Not quite what I was after, but extremely useful, and it allowed me to put in a chapter about formal civic occasions.

Another advantage of living near a major university is that there are many people in the area who have extensive private libraries, and genuine expertise, who are willing to share their books and their knowledge with me.  This is an enjoyable side of research, since I get to meet many interesting people while garnering necessary information.  I usually find these people by asking some of my friends and neighbors if they know anyone with good information about — and then I fill in what I want to know.

Probably one of the most difficult things to find out in regard to history is what people wore when they were schlepping around the house, or to put it another way, the equivalent of jeans and a t-shirt.  Another tricky thing to find is what they ate for breakfast, meaning nothing fancy, just ordinary breakfast.  These two questions have taken up more of my time in more of my historical books than anything else, largely because people tend to record what is unusual, or out of the ordinary, not what they do every day.  But it is those ordinary things that let the fiction writer gain a feel for the time and its people, and it is usually those ordinary things that produce the telling details that bring the time into sharp relief.  This is one of the reasons I find household records from the period I’m researching so useful.  Legal codes are another good source of information, although their literary style tends to be arid at best.  One book I have that I often consult is on the history of weather in Europe from the time of Socrates to the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, which includes many contemporary accounts of crop yields and shifts in weather, both of which have at least as much impact as trade, disease, and wars.

See what I mean?  A lifetime of homework.  Bring it on.

Why boycott HarperCollins?

Well, I’m late to the party with this news, but better late then never. HarperCollins has instituted a new policy of selling ebooks to libraries. After 26 checkouts, an ebook license will expire and a new license for the same book will have to be purchased. HarperCollins apparently came up with the number 26 because that would be equal to a year’s worth of two-week checkouts. Maybe in some places, books get used up and thrown out after 26 uses, but in my personal experience, unless it’s seriously damaged or out of date, I put it back together the best you can and put it back out on the shelf. The school library I worked in had a great budget for a school its size, but I could have been paying for two licenses or even three for the most popular titles, at the rate that kids checked in and out. That would have left a lot of holes in the offerings I could make, both in fiction and in nonfiction. So… there are a lot of librarians, readers, and even authors, who are vocally unhappy about this. Some are going so far as to boycott HarperCollins. This is actually quite a job, since HarperCollins owns many, many imprints.

Now, I get that publishers are in it to make money, and they see library checkouts as lost sales. With individual purchases of ebooks, you basically have one reader=one book. It’s simple to see the impact on sales. But libraries are a different matter. Libraries lend. There, you have many readers who can read the same book (which they are reading instead of buying) so publishers see those as lost sales (even though the library user might go out and buy the book afterwards if she likes it enough to want to read it 26 times).

The result of the idea that libraries get in the way of sales means that it is really difficult to get ebooks from the library. If you have a Kindle, you’re out of luck- Kindle books can’t be lent by libraries. If there’s an author you like who’s published by Macmillan- well, they don’t sell ebooks to the library market at all. It is, however, an incredibly wrongheaded idea. Libraries create and enable readers, and those are the people who are using Kindles, Nooks, and the other various ereaders out there. Nonreaders don’t use ereaders, It’s time for publishers to wake up and see that libraries are the ones creating their customers.

Libraries already face stringent budget cuts. Many are struggling for survival. This isn’t a library-friendly policy. But I question whether it’s really a good idea to boycott HarperCollins. Their imprints serve some pretty big groups of readers- romance readers, children’s books- and for a library to boycott HarperCollins (and some are even pulling print titles as well) denies something that every librarian knows is vitally important- and that’s accessibility to their community. It makes me really angry that HarperCollins is pulling this, limiting access to ebook titles , and obviously changes have to be made in the relationships major ebook publishers have with libraries (here’s a very intelligent post at EarlyWord, “Towards a New Model of Ebook Circ in Libraries”). But a library boycott is not the answer. However, you personally can make a difference by boycotting HarperCollins ebooks and by writing the CEO at HarperCollins on the behalf of libraries and ebook users (maybe you are one) with the aim of doing what we try to do here at MonsterLibrarian, which is to connect people with books, in whatever form they take.